Archive for: February, 2011

Britney Spears Tweets First Snippet Of New Single ‘Inside Out’

Feb 28 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

Spears and producer Dr. Luke post 10-second audio clip for second single off new album Femme Fatale.
By Shawn Adler


Britney Spears <i>Femme Fatale</i>
Photo: Jive

Just two days after Britney Spears released her highly anticipated video for “Hold It Against Me,” the 29-year-old diva is back to give fans another treat with a brief snippet from her next single, “Inside Out.”

“C’mon! Won’t you give me something to remember,” Spears sings in the barely 10-second clip, revealed by the singer and her producer, Dr. Luke, on Twitter.

“Baby shut your mouth and turn me inside,” she crescendos.

For fans, the brief snippet is a welcome treat, but hardly a surprising one, considering that Spears teased “Hold It Against Me” in similar fashion for several weeks.

In an interview with MTV News, Spears’ longtime manager himself, Larry Rudolph, indicated that fans were likely to hear another song before the March 29 release of Femme Fatale, the Mississippi native’s first album in three years.

Of the song itself, which he would only speak of obliquely on Thursday, Rudolph had high praise.

“I don’t think I’ve been this excited about releasing a Britney single in many, many years,” he said. “It’s that good. That’s all I’m gonna say about it at the moment. I haven’t heard a final mix of it, but I should get it in the next day or two. So far, what I’ve heard is just extraordinary. It really is amazing. Her fans will be very happy with it. I’m trying hard to get it out before the album comes out.”

What do you think of the new snippet? Will “Inside Out” be another Britney hit? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

Related Videos

Related Photos

Related Artists

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1658370/britney-spears-inside-out.jhtml

Tara Reid Taryn Manning Tatiana Zavialova Taylor Swift Teri Hatcher

No responses yet

Beyonce May Work With Diplo, Sleigh Bells On New Album

Feb 28 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

Producer says he was ‘in NYC tryin’ to make tracks’ for B and Bells’ songwriter/guitarist.
By James Montgomery


Beyonce
Photo: Jeff Kravitz/ WireImage

Over the years, Diplo has worked with everyone from Thom Yorke to Spank Rock (and, of course, M.I.A.) so perhaps it should come as no surprise that, for his next collaboration, he’s chosen to work with none other than Beyoncé. Oh, and electro-slammers Sleigh Bells, too. It all makes sense, in some bizarre way.

This is according to Dip himself, who posted a message — and a remix of the Sleigh Bells track “Tell ‘Em” — on his blog, in which he let it be known that he, his production partner Switch and Sleigh Bells’ songwriter/guitarist Derek Miller just wrapped sessions for Beyoncé’s follow-up to I Am … Sasha Fierce. He wasn’t quite sure what would come of the tracks they created.

“Me and Switch was in [the] studio in NYC tryin’ to make tracks with Derek and Beyoncé last week after we played her team [Sleigh Bells'] album,” Diplo wrote. “Dunno if we gonna manage to finish, but [it] was good times.”

At the very least, you know Bey’s husband, indie-rock fan Jay-Z, is pumped by the news. Diplo is just the latest in an ever-growing list of top-flight producers who have worked with Beyoncé in recent months. There’s still no release date or tentative title for her upcoming album, but she’s logged studio time with the likes of S1 (he of “Power” fame), Ne-Yo, Sean Garrett and Jim Jonsin.

A spokesperson for Beyoncé did not respond to MTV News’ request for comment on the Diplo tracks by press time.

Related Artists

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1656607/beyonce-diplo-sleigh-bells.jhtml

Shanna Moakler Shannon Elizabeth Shannyn Sossamon Shiri Appleby Sienna Guillory

No responses yet

Britney Spears – Radar

Feb 27 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

Radar

Source: http://www.mtv.com/overdrive/?artist=501686&vid=410008

Tricia Helfer Tricia Vessey Trista Rehn Tyra Banks Lacey Chabert

No responses yet

‘Drive Angry’: The Reviews Are In!

Feb 27 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

Should you hit the road with Nicolas Cage? See what the critics have to say.
By Eric Ditzian


David Morse and Nicolas Cage in “Drive Angry”
Photo: Summit Publicity

“Drive Angry” marks three-straight supernatural films for Nicolas Cage, though each could not be more different. “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice” was a Disney-driven tale of magical realism. “Season of the Witch” dove into the intersection of medieval black magic and campy B-movie wackiness. And “Drive Angry” literally begins with Cage driving a muscle car straight outta hell with the devil’s henchman fast on his heels and doesn’t slow down as it splashes blood and fire across the screen.

All three flicks share something else in common: below-average reviews. “Sorcerer’s” and “Season” each went on to conjure up lukewarm box-office receipts. Can “Drive Angry” break the spell? Check out what the critics are saying and decide if the new 3-D film is the right choice for you this weekend.

The Story
“[It] may be a bit too slickly self-aware for its own good, but it’s also rivetingly paced, outrageously funny and makes retina-scorching use of the new 3D technology. Nicolas Cage is on teeth-baring, eye-rolling form as John Milton (nice), the deceased felon who busts out of hell to track down the Southern death cult who kidnapped his baby granddaughter. Hooking up with mouthy muscle-car-driving white-trash waitress Piper (Amber Heard), Milton sets off in pursuit, all the while attempting to avoid the attentions of Satan’s right-hand man, The Accountant (a majestically arch William Fichtner).” — Tom Huddleston, Time Out

Crazy Nic Cage
“A little respect, if you please, for His Satanic Majesty Nicolas Cage. Nobody goes off the deep end like Nic. Nobody gives better value in bad movies than the sleepy-eyed Oscar winner with a gift for picking bad movies. ‘Drive Angry’ is a very entertaining B, C or D-movie, an over-the-top and in-your-face grindhouse gore, guns and ‘Gun it’ picture that’s about epic shootouts, bone-snapping brawls, bare breasts and muscle cars. The gunplay is funny and the sex hilarious in this ‘Ghost Rider is Gone in 60 Seconds’ mashup.” — Roger Moore, Orlando Sentinel

The 3-D
” ‘Drive Angry’ is intensely bloody, violent and carries quite a few payoffs that are well delivered. It’s also a movie you’d actually want to see in 3-D, unlike so many frauds in the marketplace these days. In fact, Lussier, who directed ‘My Bloody Valentine 3D,’ shows his growth as a 3-dimensional director by taking ‘Drive Angry’ to new heights. Seeing it in Real D, the depth was astounding, and Lussier throws a few CGI tricks right in the viewer’s face. Even more impressive was his flashback sequence that could easily become one of the most influential in the 3-D age (the way he layers three ‘thoughts’ at once is mind-blowing visually). In short, it’s worth the extra few bucks.” — Brad Miska, Bloody Disgusting

Going Grindhouse
” ‘Drive Angry’ is loud and busy, and it’s rarely boring. But it’s also never really good. ‘Drive Angry’ comes at the tail end of the grindhouse revival trend, and while it’s better made than films like ‘Machete’ or the scores of indie films that followed in Quentin Tarantino’s wake, it succumbs to the same problem so many of those movies do: it’s a movie about the things that the filmmakers think are cool, and that’s never cool. ‘Drive Angry’ isn’t about anything, it’s just a series of ideas that struck Lussier and Farmer as awesome, strung together at feature length. There’s a lot of balls in Drive Angry, and even some brains, but no heart.” — Devin Faraci, Badass Digest

The Final Word
” ‘Drive Angry’ is, in the end, a genre romp. It’s not aiming any higher than that. But it is made with real skill and style, and there’s such knowledge of genre in the way they have built the script and both embraced and avoided certain conventions that it makes me feel like we’re just seeing Farmer and Lussier warm up. Hopefully they’ll keep working with collaborators as game as their partners in this particular crime, because ‘Drive Angry’ is a white-knuckle ride worth taking.” — Drew McWeeny, HitFix

Check out everything we’ve got on “Drive Angry.”

For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com.

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1658776/drive-angry-reviews.jhtml

Scarlett Johansson Selita Ebanks Shakara Ledard Shakira Shana Hiatt

No responses yet

‘Hangover Part II’ Trailer: The Five Coolest Moments

Feb 27 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

From the monkey on Bradley Cooper’s back to Ed Helms’ tribal face tattoo, we can’t wait to hit this destination wedding.
By Eric Ditzian


Ed Helms, Bradley Cooper and Zack Galifianakis in “The Hangover Part II”
Photo: Warner Bros.

Todd Phillips promised and he delivered. Last week, the writer/director — who these days can’t seem to make an R-rated comedy that doesn’t do mega-business across the globe — assured MTV News that the teaser trailer for “Hangover Part II” would be popping up online this week.

And pop up it has. True to Phillips’ words the footage is “truly a teaser,” with almost no dialogue and little hint about the events surrounding what clearly turns an innocent destination wedding in Thailand into a life-altering disaster. We do, however, contest Phillips’ speculation that the teaser “might end up frustrating more than solving questions.” While questions are hardly solved, we couldn’t be more pumped finally to feast our eyes on official footage from the Memorial Day weekend release. Here are our picks for the five coolest moments:

Hotel or Prison?
In “The Hangover,” Bradley Cooper and his pals find their way into one of the chicest suites in Las Vegas. Their digs in Thailand, alas, look more like the confines of a prison — less “King and I” than “Brokedown Palace.” There’s no way that this was their original resort locale. It’s anybody’s guess how and why they end up in this dump.

Say Goodbye to That Security Deposit
This image is a direct homage to the post-party scene in “Hangover”: After swilling what turned out to be roofie-infused booze, the friends awoke in their trashed Vegas suite, each one nursing a nuclear headache as a tiger roamed freely in the bathroom. This time around, the morning after takes place in a decidedly less glamorous environment and the big cat is replaced by an oversize cockroach.

The Wolf Pack is Back
In the original film, Zach Galifianakis proudly — and nonsensically — welcomed the crew into his wolf pack. Disaster ensued. This shot shows the gang back together again. Missing, interestingly, is Justin Bartha, who went missing in the first flick and whose absence in the new trailer seems to lend credence to the rumor that he’ll once again disappear in “Part II.”

Is This Kind of Nice?
The trailer’s first piece of dialogue belongs to Galifianakis and it’s, predictably, hilariously detached from what is clearly a seriously bad situation. Why else is a monkey wrapped around Cooper’s neck? Why does Galifianakis look like a blind man shaved his noggin? And about Ed Helms’ face …

Mike Tyson, Trendsetter
Iron Mike’s cameo in “Hangover” was one of the comedy’s finest pleasures. And as we’ve seen from “Part II” photos, Helms somehow finds himself branded with Tyson’s most infamous identifier: a tribal face tattoo. For a guy about to get married, that’s just not a good look. As he says before hanging his head, “Oh god!”

For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com.

Related Photos

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1658649/hangover-2-trailer.jhtml

Shannyn Sossamon Shiri Appleby Sienna Guillory Sienna Miller Simone Mütherthies

No responses yet

Katy Perry’s Grammy Performance: Hot Pants And Even Hotter Kisses?

Feb 27 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

California Gurl is promising ‘quite a surprise’ for Sunday night’s show.
By James Montgomery


Katy Perry
Photo: Chelsea Lauren/ FilmMagic

She’s already promised that her Grammy performance will be “quite a surprise,” but given that this is Katy Perry talking, that could mean practically anything.

So on Sunday, when the California Gurl takes the stage at the Grammys, will we be getting LED-enhanced hot pants? Whipped-cream-launching chest cannons? Fireworks erupting over European cityscapes? Or will she simply play it smelly?

From the sound of things, it might just be “all of the above.” Last month, Perry said her Grammy performance would most certainly be a medley — featuring her trio of chart-topping singles, “California Gurls,” “Teenage Dream” and “Firework” — but added that she was planning to go “beyond” that formula. Just what does that mean? Well, KP’s not talking — and why would she? That would ruin the surprise.

“I’m going to do a really cool, heartfelt song that I really love and show a different side,” she told Zap2it.com. “I think I’ll do a medley of sorts … but not too much. It’ll be quite a surprise.”

And if there’s one thing Perry’s performances have been as of late, it’s definitely surprising. At last year’s MTV Movie Awards, she camped it up on “California Gurls,” descending from the rafters on a surfboard, batting around beach balls, and, of course, rocking those hot pants. Later that month, she brought a similarly beachy theme to New York’s Times Square, filling the Crossroads of the World with sand and sashaying across the stage in a tight, DayGlo dress (with neon-pink palm trees added for extra flair).

Recently, she’s toned things down a tad — sort of. In November, at the Europe Music Awards, she did a rather staid — for her, at least — take on “Firework,” dressed in a bedazzled one-piece and focusing on the empowering message of the song (of course, it still ended in a climatic pyro show). She took the same tact while performing the song at the American Music Awards, backed by a children’s choir.

But the beauty of Katy Perry is that you just never know what you’ll get — from the sublimely silly to the, well, sublime, she’s done it all in a live setting. And you get the feeling she’s not done just yet. Coupled with the fact that she’ll head into the Grammys in the running for four awards — including Album of the Year for Teenage Dream — and her upcoming world tour, and, well, you get the feeling she’s not going to hold anything back on Sunday. Actually, she even said as much in her interview with Zap2It.

“It’s like training for the Olympics. I’m off to the gym to build stamina … and I hate working out, but I have to go, because this is a really energetic show,” she said. “It’s not like I’m going to make my fortune off touring; I’m basically doing this as a big IOU for all the love and support I’ve gotten. I need to go shake some hands and kiss some people.”

Kissing people — now that sounds like something worthy of the Grammy stage. And knowing Katy Perry, we wouldn’t put a few awards-show smooches past her. But regardless of what she decides to do on Sunday night’s show, we can guarantee you one thing: You’ll definitely be talking about it on Monday — and probably the rest of the week too.

Don’t miss “Snooki & Sway: Live From the Grammys,” a red-carpet live stream kicking off Sunday at 6 p.m. ET on MTV.com. And stick with us all Grammy night for coverage of the red carpet, the show, the afterparties and beyond!

Related Photos

Related Artists

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1657453/katy-perry-grammy-awards.jhtml

Nikki Reed Norah Jones Noureen DeWulf Olivia Munn Olivia Wilde

No responses yet

New ‘Never Say Never’ Clip Shows Justin Bieber Singing With Fan

Feb 27 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

The ‘Director’s Fan Cut’ teaser captures the teen sensation performing an acoustic version of ‘Baby’ with a young girl.
By Eric Ditzian


Justin Bieber in the new “Never Say Never” clip
Photo: Paramount

Earlier this week, “Never Say Never” director Jon Chu promised MTV News that his new “Director’s Fan Cut” of Justin Bieber’s 3-D flick would deliver 40 minutes of fresh footage, including different songs (such as “Favorite Girl”), some more shirtless shots of the teen singer (“Maybe some abs!”) and extra scenes of him interacting with fans.

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

With the recut movie hitting theaters on Friday (February 25), Paramount Pictures has released a clip showing just that: the Biebs hanging out with some of his young fanatical followers. The 71-second promo shows Bieber — pre-haircut, of course — at an intimate gathering in Phoenix. While the pop star gives an acoustic performance on a small stage, his fans beg him to play “Baby,” but he jokes, “I don’t know that song.”

He then declares to a very young fan, “I’ll only sing ‘Baby’ if you come up here and sing it with me.” Cue the cuteness. The girl sits on his lap and together they belt out the hit single.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen Bieber show off an easy, breezy way with his youngest fans. Last year, he popped up on “Jimmy Kimmel Live” to surprise a 3-year-old Belieber named Cody who’d become an Internet sensation after her sister posted a video of her crying over the teen heartthrob on YouTube. As he tweeted later, “Makin faces with Cody!”

The re-released “Never Say Never” represents an effort both to goose box-office receipts three weeks after the film’s initial opening and to feed the Beliebers’ seemingly insatiable appetite for anything and everything connected to the star.

“We originally had a two-and-a-half-hour version of the movie, which we obviously couldn’t release,” Chu explained to us. “So we started to think about putting stuff back in that didn’t have to do with our story but that we knew people would love.”

Are you planning to go see the “Director’s Fan Cut” of “Never Say Never”? Let us know in the comments.

Related Photos

Related Artists

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1658725/justin-bieber-never-say-never-clip.jhtml

Simone Mütherthies Sofía Vergara Soft Cell Sophia Bush Stacy Keibler

No responses yet

Justin Bieber, Eminem Grammy Snubs Prompt Open Letter From Hip-Hop Brand Manager

Feb 27 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

‘The awards show has become a series of hypocrisies and contradictions,’ writes Steve Stoute in full page ad.
By Shawn Adler


Steve Stoute
Photo: Theo Wargo/WireImage

Ad man, brand manager and occasional consigliere to many of hip-hop’s most powerful stars, marketing mogul Steve Stoute took out a full page ad in Sunday’s New York Times Style Section blasting the Grammy Awards, its parent organizational, The National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS), and its president, Neil Portnow, for what he feels is both increasing irrelevance and possible malfeasance.

“Over the course of my 20-year history as an executive in the music business and as the owner of a firm that specializes in in-culture advertising, I have come to the conclusion that the Grammy Awards have clearly lost touch with contemporary popular culture,” he wrote in the ad, which took the form of an open letter. “The awards show has become a series of hypocrisies and contradictions, leaving me to question why any contemporary popular artist would even participate.”

In particular, Stoute focused on the relatively recent snubs of Eminem, Kayne West, and Justin Bieber, all musicians he believes have been unfairly beaten for awards by inferior artistic and commercial acts.

“We must acknowledge the massive cultural impact of Eminem and Kanye West and how their music is shaping, influencing and defining the voice of a generation,” Stoute wrote of the two hip-hop superstars, adding of Bieber, “How is it that Justin Bieber, an artist that defines what it means to be a modern artist, did not win Best New Artist?”

While acknowledging in his letter that the most popular acts aren’t always deserving of awards simply on the basis of their commercial success, of particular focus for Stoute is the seeming dichotomy between musicians the award ceremony chooses to honor and musicians the ceremony asks to perform.

“While these very artists that the public acknowledges as being worthy of their money and fandom are snubbed year after year at the Grammys, the awards show has absolutely no qualms in inviting these same artists to perform,” he wrote. “Interesting that the Grammys understands cultural relevance when it comes to using Eminem’s, Kayne West’s or Justin Bieber’s name in the billing [but not when handing out trophies].”

Not content to simply attribute these gaps to the general irrelevance or ignorance of the NARAS voters, Stoute goes on to suggest that performances are scheduled much more cynically and crassly, citing this year’s Best Album winner Arcade Fire as an example of an act too serendipitous to be coincidental.

“What truly inspired the writing of this letter was that this most recent show fed my suspicions. As the show was coming to a close and just prior to presenting the award for Album of the Year, Arcade Fire performed ‘Month of May’ only to, surprise, win the category and, in a moment of sheer coincidence, happened to be prepared to perform ‘Ready to Start’,” he wrote. “Does the Grammys intentionally use artists for their celebrity, popularity and cultural appeal when they already know the winners and then program a show against this expectation?”

According to the official website of the Grammys, it would be impossible for anyone to know the winners of the various awards before the show, as they are delivered in sealed envelopes to the presenters by Deloitte Accounting.

The winners themselves are determined by several rounds of submission and voting, starting with a screening process where 150 “experts” ensure “that each entry is placed in its proper category.”

From there, nomination ballots are sent out. Voters are encouraged to vote only in their area of expertise in addition to the four general categories, incidentally the same categories Stoute has the most problems with: Record Of The Year, Album Of The Year, Song Of The Year and Best New Artist.

The top five vote getters from this process are listed as the official nominees. Finally, ballots are sent out with the new, limited choices to determine a winner.

Not good enough, Stoute says, believing this system is possibly ripe for being corrupted.

“The National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences hides behind the ‘peer’ voting system to escape culpability for not even rethinking this approach,” he writes. “You are being called to task at this very moment, NARAS.”

Representatives from NARAS have not responded to MTV’s request for comment by press time.

Related Photos

Related Artists

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1658385/steve-stoute-grammys-new-york-times.jhtml

Tyra Banks Lacey Chabert Laetitia Casta Lake Bell Larissa Meek

No responses yet

Justin Bieber Is ‘Really Growing Up,’ Says ‘Never Say Never’ Director

Feb 27 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

Jon M. Chu says teen star is ‘learning how to interact with people.’
By Eric Ditzian


Photo: Kevin Winter/ Getty Images

MTV News first interviewed Justin Bieber in September of 2009, when the pint-size pop singer was on the cusp of breaking beyond his core audience into mainstream pop stardom. Then 15 years old and relatively new to the national media spotlight, Bieber wasn’t nervous so much as generally tentative, a bit clipped and repetitive in his answers.

When Bieber walked into the MTV Newsroom earlier this month to promote the difference in his on-camera demeanor couldn’t have been more different: He projected a breezy confidence, at times humorous or eye-on-the-prize focused, and was engaging throughout.

That Bieber has truly matured — not just as an artist, but as a person — isn’t apparent only to those who occasionally cross his path. Jon M. Chu, who directed and began working with the singer in August, has noticed the change as well.

“With the movie and going to the Grammys and being respected on so many different levels beyond just his own fanbase, he’s really growing up and learning how to interact with people,” Chu said.

The director said he noted a great difference in the young star’s disposition following the completion of his seven-month, 86-show tour.

“He’s just had time to rest,” said Chu, who started shooting “Never Say Never” as Bieber was in the midst of that nonstop North American tour. At first, Bieber was standoffish. Only gradually did the two establish a close creative partnership.

“Half of it was just me gaining trust with him because I was in his face with a camera,” Chu said. “It was very much like ‘Almost Famous,’ where I was just on the bus and he didn’t really want me there. Once we got past that, we were fine.”

Have you noticed a change in Justin Bieber? Tell us below!

Check out everything we’ve got on “Justin Bieber: Never Say Never.”

For young Hollywood news, fashion and Justin Bieber updates around the clock, visit HollywoodCrush.MTV.com.

Related Videos

Related Photos

Related Artists

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1658527/justin-bieber-never-say-never.jhtml

Sara Foster Sara Spraker Sarah Gellman Sarah Michelle Gellar Sarah Mutch

No responses yet

Britney Spears – Womanizer

Feb 27 2011 Published by under Uncategorized

Womanizer

Source: http://www.mtv.com/overdrive/?artist=501686&vid=288244

Laura Prepon Lauren Bush Lauren Conrad Lauren German LeAnn Rimes

No responses yet

« Newer posts Older posts »